[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#777116: marked as done (unblock: dnssec-trigger/0.13~svn685-4)



Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:19:04 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#777116: unblock: dnssec-trigger/0.13~svn685-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #777116,
regarding unblock: dnssec-trigger/0.13~svn685-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
777116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Please unblock package dnssec-trigger

Hi,

it was discovered that dnssec-trigger doesn't cooperate well with
resolvconf.  While I already made a patch that would change that, it's
too intrusive to have it in jessie right now, so this package adds
a simple:

Breaks: resolvconf

to d/control.

and we will focus on having a proper fix in zurg :).

diff:

$ git diff debian/0.13_svn685-3..debian/0.13_svn685-4
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index bdf30bb..510c636 100644
- --- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dnssec-trigger (0.13~svn685-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add Breaks: resolvconf because immutable flag on resolv.conf doesn't
+    play well with resolvconf (Closes: #776776)
+
+ -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>  Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:36:36 +0100
+
 dnssec-trigger (0.13~svn685-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [Diane Trout]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index f36e7f0..930eced 100644
- --- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
         python-lockfile,
         gir1.2-networkmanager-1.0 [linux-any],
         unbound
+Breaks: resolvconf
 Description: reconfiguration tool to make DNSSEC work
  Dnssec-trigger reconfigures the local unbound DNS server. This unbound
  DNS server performs DNSSEC validation, but dnssec-trigger will signal

unblock dnssec-trigger/0.13~svn685-4

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU0y9cXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzMEI5MzNEODBGQ0UzRDk4MUEyRDM4RkIw
Qzk5QjcwRUY0RkNCQjA3AAoJEAyZtw70/LsHzc8P/1oDy9TUsDtV3mr8XIkiuJJR
LmVIgwX2iivwBHxSSL1KQndNH0pqecJtDK6rC6FGs/xxQLGsMCOAWD27HIWNY33c
1nlKo3xgOgM4PbJaPFf+Y0JSGh6aspWVVwRPRfswXqE4wv3mFVsx9OapGX1HvBx9
bcsiFesh+Qwb9Fynq+kt26nExm9CojB0DDb6XSXhgX/zpuwoRtVzhKrIlU3yBgU2
Xogn2xYkcThmy9pQiwewOW/YJj+ggtHYMEGLDiRZp3lXrBW+HGw7PQf4jgUMKybD
sL3KLraAs2EldGghxhsuiNbY3CFOvmE80SXrw+r7h83mZsPMDz96GUauW7XuGWex
NvP+SIeQ/X5IfGWJKp2D7/I3ailrjYHTuP3BZjAh6z7FhRQBDUhKs/bHIhuGnCZS
Nu64jby0YgnWST5e+S/KAGmPNWqOHbS/qmqz9OSEmB/oiBcdfu5qtBtt+H0oFxos
XTIttxY1kUezk1NhOcBr0Kaz0yxSBBip9YCqusLWeCVIfYJB1wvRMujcaL5uT00a
lkneF76XAYGbdX1IYLq+YTrouJECNrQPVFHCqVhiPsi8/gyy35n7S9swgQQgccFR
Mttez+4s3CvupkVWy+Pux3zuKi5chV77/BGjolrx6HftN6ZFme4zDNMgO4y+/ikw
4wYwnJ8qOvGa4WoG0Xkr
=wbXF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Le 2015-02-05 09:52, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Please unblock package dnssec-trigger


Unblocked.

Regards,

--
Mehdi

--- End Message ---

Reply to:
OSZAR »