[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#777155: marked as done (unblock: calendarserver/5.2.2+dfsg-2)

Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:50:41 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#777155: unblock: calendarserver/5.2.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #777155,
regarding unblock: calendarserver/5.2.2+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
777155: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777155
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package calendarserver

RC Bug#765644 was fixed long back in calendarserver 5.2.2+dfsg-2 (even before
jessie freeze). Unfortunately, the Bug was not closed because an upgrade had to
be pushed to wheezy calendarserver as well.

unblock calendarserver/5.2.2+dfsg-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (1000, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2015-02-05 17:49, Rahul Amaram wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package calendarserver
> 
> RC Bug#765644 was fixed long back in calendarserver 5.2.2+dfsg-2 (even before
> jessie freeze). Unfortunately, the Bug was not closed because an upgrade had to
> be pushed to wheezy calendarserver as well.
> 
> unblock calendarserver/5.2.2+dfsg-2
> 
> [...]

Hi,

Thanks for the request.

Unfortunately, I will have to decline your request.  The removal of the
package is vastly longer than a week ago.  Furthermore, the package in
question is not in a state where it can migrate - it FTBFS on two
release architectures (where it built in the past).
  By the looks of it, you might want to have the binaries removed on
these architectures.  Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org for that.

Unrelated to your unblock request, the #765644 bug seems like it should
affect the stable version.  Please consider adding the proper fixed
version to the bug, so the BTS is correctly aware of this.
Alternatively, reopen it and tag it wheezy.  Using either (but not both)
will make the BTS correctly determine that stable (and not unstable) is
affected by this bug.

Yours truly,
~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to:
OSZAR »