[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1051182: wsjtx: new upstream version 2.7.x



On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:07:49PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:39:38PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > This bug is for coordination purposes.  I am in the process of preparing
> > an upload of WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc2 to experimental, but I believe that it
> > may require an upload of hamlib 4.6 (which will also likely need to go
> > to experimental first).
> > 
> > The debian branch will be pushed to debian/experimental to follow DEP-14
> > (https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep14/), and if the team is okay
> > with it, I propose switching from master -> debian/latest when the
> > package is ready for upload to unstable.
> 
> I have built wsjtx_2.7.0~rc2+repack-1 against bookworm and tested WSJT-X
> running against the current version of hamlib in bookworm without any
> issues, so I don't think there is a requirement for this to be
> coordinated with an upload of hamlib.
> 
> I'll do some more testing in trixie/unstable, but based on what I've
> seen so far, I think 2.7.0~rc2 is a candidate for an upload to unstable.
> Please let me know if there are any concerns.

After successful testing with this version on trixie/unstable, I have
uploaded 2.7.0~rc2 to unstable and updated the default branch in the
Salsa repo to debian/latest.

As always, thank you for filing bug reports and suggestions.

Perhaps of interest to WSJT-X users is this recent thread [1] on
wsjt-devel regarding new functionality added to PSKReporter for the
upcoming solar eclipse [2].

Cheers,
tony

https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/message/37896251/
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/eclipses/2023/oct-14-annular/where-when/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to:
OSZAR »