Re: Do we need fldigi?
* Joop Stakenborg <[email protected]> [2007 Feb 22 01:26 -0600]:
> Would it be worthwhile packaging fldigi: http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html
>
> We already have gmfsk, another multimode application....
Yes.
It seems that fldigi is receiving development attention these days. It
is very good technically with a very sound implementation of the
various modes. The UI is still rough and I've noted a few interesting
bugs (I need to try it again since switching computers in the shack as
the other one had some problems).
I think that fldigi would benefit from the increased exposure that
being in Debian would bring.
Here's my vote for packaging fldigi.
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
Reply to: