Re: proposal: ITR (was Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: proposal: ITR (was Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?)
From: Ben Finney <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:03:05 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] [email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[🔎] [email protected]>

Adam Borowski <[email protected]> writes:

> One issue: on a small screen, crap font and no glasses, "ITR" looks similar
> to "ITP", an alternate acronym could be better.

RFI (Request for Interest)
RFU (Request for Users)
POLL (Participate Or Let's Lose this)

-- 
 \            “Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists in |
  `\       choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable.” —John |
_o__)                                    Kenneth Galbraith, 1962-03-02 |
Ben Finney

Reply to:

References:
- proposal: ITR (was Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?)
  - From: Adam Borowski <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?
Next by Date: Re: proposal: ITR (was Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?)
Previous by thread: Re: proposal: ITR (was Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?)
Next by thread: Re: proposal: ITR (was Re: Removing packages perhaps too aggressively?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

	
		OSZAR »