Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
From: Jakub Wilk <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:34:44 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] [email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[🔎] [email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[🔎] [email protected]> <[🔎] [email protected]>

* Andreas Tille <[email protected]>, 2016-01-19, 20:04:

Just for the record: I'm currently touching all those packagesmaintained by Debian Med and not uploaded for >3 years. Some lastremainings of dh5 were removed and some other issues solved. I admitall of these "long time not uploaded" packages had some issues thatrectify a new upload. IMHO also debian/compat < 9 is another goodreason since automatic build time testing is not done if existing.

I don't know what you mean by dh5, but I'm pretty sure there was nochange regarding "automatic build time testing" in compat 9.


--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
  - From: Andreas Tille <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]>
- Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
  - From: Andreas Tille <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now
Next by Date: RFA: alliance
Previous by thread: Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
Next by thread: Re: Packages with /outdated/ packaging style
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

	
		OSZAR »