Re: Licenses not in /usr/share/common-licenses
Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> writes:
> So, I think [0] is the most astute message in that thread.
> [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2000/11/msg00251.html
I thought that too when I first read it, but later in the thread are very
cogent arguments for why it's wrong and providing a complete copy of the
GPL with binaries is required.
--
Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: